CTTEP Required Courses and Faculty


DIDACTIC COURSES
DAY/TIME-FRIDAYS, 12:15 P.M-1:45 P.M.

Orientation: Getting to Know You Lunch
Week 1
Instructors: Shelly Goldklank, Ph.D. and Ethan Graham, Ph.D.

How to Keep Your Head When They’re Losing Theirs: Theory of Technique
Weeks 2-6
Instructor: Shelly Goldklank, Ph.D.

A Tavistock Approach
Week 7
Visiting Lecturer: Julie Friend, LCSW

Non-Verbal Register in Couples Therapy
Weeks 8 & 9
Instructor: Stacy Malin, Ph.D.

Infidelity in Couples Therapy
Weeks 10 & 11
Instructor: Kim Sarasohn, Ph.D.

When Couples Seek Treatment As Parents
Week 12
Instructor: TBD

Unconscious Coupling: Taped Session Analysis
Weeks 13 & 14
Instructor: Shelly Goldklank, Ph.D.

Diversities in Work with Couples: Curiosity and Radical Openness
Week 15
Instructor: Anton Hart, Ph.D.

Race Matters in Couples Dynamics
Weeks 16 & 17
Instructor: Monique Bowen, Ph.D.

Dynamics in Latino/Spanish Inclusive Couples
Week 18
Instructor: Tomas Casado-Frankel, MA, LMFT

Taped-session analysis: applying what we’ve learned
Weeks 19
Instructor: Shelly Goldklank, Ph.D. and Ethan Graham, Ph.D.

Talking About Sex in Couples Therapy
Weeks 20 & 21
Instructor: Tiziano Colibazzi, M.D.

Dynamics in Gay Male Relationships
Week 22
Instructor: David Braucher, Ph.D.

Dynamics in Lesbian Couples
Week 23
Instructor: Suzanne Iasenza, Ph.D.

High Conflict Couples
Weeks 24-26
Instructor: Susan Flinn, Ph.D.

Uses of the Self in Couples Therapy
Week  27 & 28
Instructor: Ethan Graham, Ph.D.

Candidate Questions About Theory and Practice: Recapitulating Theory of Technique (Wrap Up)
Week 29 & 30
Instructors: Shelly Goldklank, Ph.D. and Ethan Graham, Ph.D.

Clinical Case Conferences

Fridays, 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m.


Bartlett

Weeks 1-10

Faculty: Robert Bartlett, Ph.D.

Skolnick

Weeks 11-20

Faculty: Elena Skolnick, Ph.D.

Graham

Weeks 21-30

Faculty: Ethan Graham, Ph.D.

Clinical Case Conference Learning Objectives

1.Students will use the information from the didactic course to increase their professional competence.
2. Students will compare couples therapy treatment with work with individuals.
3. Students will use techniques for establishing trusting relationships between therapists and couples.
4. Students will be able to take a genogram for their patients and use it in such a way that the information anticipates transference/countertransference.
5. Students will be able to demonstrate in a case how the variables of membership, power and affection interact as a three-generational family goes through the phase of emerging adulthood.
6. Students will be able to explore how they can deal with the problem of favoring one person in a couple over another in their own treatment cases.
7. Students will  present a couples therapy case giving the most relevant couples issues in order to obtain group input into their clinical work.
8. Students will  give positive feedback to each other when presenting clinical material.

Individual Consultants

Once weekly consultation hours for a minimum of 30 weeks


Miri Abramis, Ph.D.
Bob Bartlett, Ph.D.
Roberta Caplan, Ph.D.
Tiziano Colibazzi, M.D.
Debra Farbman, Ph.D.
Deborah Glazer, Ph.D.
Francine Godet, Psy.D.
Ethan Graham, Ph.D.
Sharon Kofman, Ph.D.
Elizabeth Krimendahl, Psy.D.
Stacy Malin, Ph.D.
Susan Shimmerlik, Ph.D.
Elena Skolnick, Ph.D.

Please note that the above may be subject to change.

Learning Objective(s)


Monique Bowen, Ph.D.

Upon completion of this course, participants will be able to:

1. Analyze key psychoanalytic and psychodynamic texts on ethnocultural and racial identity, class, and intersectionality to identify two ways in which unconscious and social forces shape couple dynamics.

2. Assess one’s class‑, ethnicity-, race‑, gender‑, and orientation‑based assumptions–only a few dimensions of difference related to assigned readings for this module–through guided reflection and peer discussion to name at least one activity that will enhance cultural self‑awareness in clinical work.

3. Apply at least two relevant interventions in couples therapy case scenarios presented to address patterns of division, harmony, and neglect.

Tomás Casado-Frankel, LMFT-D

1. Participants will be able to identify and explore 3 cultural, linguistic, or ethnic forces at play within the dynamic of a couple, as well as 2 unconscious loyalties the couple may have to their families of origin and heritage.

2. Participants will be able to identify and describe 3 power dynamics embedded in relationship rules (including code switching/language use) and how they get played out within the couple, bringing partners closer together and/or distancing them. 

Susan Flinn, Ph.D.

1. Candidates will be able to list at least 3 different theories about high conflict couples. ( Theories will include attachment, trauma, object-relations, systems and EFT).

2. Candidates will be able to demonstrate to the couple members how their attachment anxieties fuel their problematic dynamics.

3. Candidates will be able to design initial interventions for de-escalating high conflict behavior.

4. Candidates will be able to create additional interventions to reduce repetitive cycles of high conflict.

5. Candidates will be able to create a safer space for the couple to heal their attachment injuries and demonstrate to them how to do so.

6. Candidates will be able to plan with the couple rules to interrupt and eliminate any violence.

Shelly Goldklank, Ph.D.

1. After the first class, students will be able to list at least two constructs from psychoanalysis (e.g. transference/countertransference) and two from systems therapy (e.g. co-construction) that are integrated in the orientation of this program.
2. After the second class, students will be able to take a genogram, getting information about the family of origin of each member of the couple in such a way that the information anticipates transference/countertransference issues relevant to the presenting couple’s complaint.
3. After the third class, students should be able to diagnose which of three crucial components of couple functioning are relevant for their couple’s case.
4. After the fourth class, students should be able to analyze in a commitment difficulty in a couple.
5. After the fifth class, students should be able to analyze a power or an intimacy difficulty.
6. After the sixth class, students would be able to assess and make a plan about what to do when they are siding, unconsciously at first and collusively with the system, with one person in a couple over another.
7. After the seventh class, students should be able to present their couples’ cases giving the most relevant couple’s issues, rather than individual issues, that is, the students should begin to speak systemically as well as speaking their more familiar psychoanalytic language and conceptualization. Their descriptions should not only include complementarity and similarity, but also life cycle stage, triangulations, and horizontal manifestations of vertical (family of origin) unresolved issues.

Ethan Graham, Ph.D.

  1. Candidates will be able to define key elements of countertransference and gain facility in understanding the complex ways they manifest in couples work.
  2. Candidates will explore ways of using metaphor and other non-linear creative processes to meaningfully engage and impact couples beneficially in their clinical work.
  3. Candidates will develop ways to harness unique aspects of their own approaches to their general clinical work and adapt them to the particular demands of treating couples.
  4. Candidates will be able to describe the complexities around intentionally and implicitly disclosing different types of information to their couples and gain greater sensitivity to the usefulness and risks of doing so.

Anton Hart, Ph.D.

Students will be able to:
1. Recognize the importance of cultivating curiosity when working with couples to address issues related to diversity.
2. Conceptualize and understand a hermeneutic orientation to clinical inquiry.
3. Identify the central role of the unbidden and of relational freedom within the clinical encounter with couples.
4. Describe three central impacts of race and racism on a given couple, regardless of the particular ethnicities of the members of the couple.
5. Conceptualize diversities of sexuality and gender as requiring the same kinds of open-mindedness and sensitivity as other diversities where discrimination is often a feature.

Suzanne Iasenza, Ph.D.

Participants will be able to describe special issues when working with lesbian couples.

Contemporary References for CTTEP

1st Third (September- November)

1. Goldklank, S (2009) “The Shoop Shoop Song”: A Guide to psychoanalytic-systemic couple therapy, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 45, 1, 3-25.

2. Papp, P., Scheinkman, M, & Malpas, J. (2013) Breaking the mold: Sculpting impasses in couples’ therapy. Family Process, 52, 1, 33-45.

3. Wachtel, E. (2017) The Heart of Couple Therapy: Knowing What to Do and How to Do It. Guilford Press, N.Y., Chapter Eight, 136-155.

2nd third (December – mid February)

1. Iasenza, S. (2020). The sexual history: Conscious and unconscious narratives. In S. Iasenza, Transforming sexual narratives: A relational approach to sex therapy. NY: Routledge.

2. Matheny, B., Teng, B., & Hart, A. (2021). Radical Openness: An interview with Anton Hart (Part I). Room, 2:21, 14-17.

3. Knight, Z. G. (2013). Black client, white therapist: Working with race in psychoanalytic psychotherapy in South Africa. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94:17-31.

3rd third (mid-February-May)

1. Antunes-Alves, S. and De Stefano, J. (2014). Intimate partner violence: Making the case for joint couple treatment. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 22(1): 62-68.

2. Goldner, V. (2014). Romantic Bonds, Binds and
Ruptures. Couples on the Brink. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol.24 (4),402-418.

3. The relevance of pre-exposure prophylaxis in gay men’s lives and their motivations to use it: a qualitative study. Alcantar Heredia, J.L. and Goldklank, S., BMC Public Health, (2021), 21, 1829.

Ethics

1: Couple Therapy in the 2020s: Current status and emerging developments Lebow, J and Snyder, D Family Process, (2022)  Sept 29; 61 (4): 1359-1385

2: =Ethical Decision-Making in Marriage and Family Therapy: A Review of the Literature Heather Katafiasz, Rikki PattonDavid Tefteller and  Momoko Takeda, Published Online:16 Feb 2021 https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2020.39.4.29

3: The relevance of pre-exposure prophylaxis in gay men’s lives and their motivations to use it: a qualitative studyAlcantar, J L and Goldklank, S (2021) BM Public  Health, (2021) 21:1829

4: Ethical practice in Couple and Family Therapy: negotiating Rocky Terrain
Shaw,  E  (2015)Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 2015, doi: 10.1002/anzf.1129

5: Burgoyne, N., & Cohn, A.S. (2020). Lessons from the transition to relational teletherapy during COVID-19.  Family Process, 59 (3), 974-988. 

William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis & Psychology 20 West 74th Street, New York, NY 10023 | (212) 873-0725